Shropshire Chess Association
2008 AGM
Held at Shifnal &
Telford Chess Club, June 26, 2008.
Meeting Commenced at 7:45pm
Attendees Roger Brown(RB),
Keith Grice(KG), Vincent Crean(VC), John Casewell(JC), Keith Tabner(KT), Graham
Shepherd(GS), Windsor Peck(WP), Nick Rutter(NR), Toby Neal(TN), Richard
Thompson(RT), Francis Best(FB), Colin Roberts (CR), Iain Wilson(IW).
1)
Apologies for absence. Received from Derrick
Powell, Glyn Pugh, Martin Patterson, Gary White
2)
Minutes of 2007 - It was pointed out that the
list of attendees was missing but the minutes were accepted as a true record of
the meeting matters arising. FB had
investigated the ECF individual membership but had concluded that it would work
out more expensive than the current scheme. It was felt that the ECF would
eventually impose such a scheme.
3)
Officer’s reports.
a)
General Secretary. CR referred everyone to
the proposed rule change attached to the back of the rules, which would be
discussed after the break.
b)
League Controller. RT had taken over the
position during the season. The season ran smoothly with only one match being
defaulted. There was one dispute re Vinnie Crean playing for Telepost B and
C team. Telepost took the view that due
to inactivity he was playing well below his old grade. RT said he couldn’t play
for the C team any more. Telepost appealed and won the appeal. Division 1 was
won by Telepost A although Church Stretton A ran them close. Relegated were
Ludlow and Wellington. It was pointed out by GS that there were various
addition errors in the report presented although the website showed the correct
picture. Division 2 was a two horse race between Telepost B & Oswestry.
Relegated were Coddon B & Wellington B. Division 3 Market Drayton faded and
were beaten by Shifnal & Telford C and Shrewsbury C. Presentations were made to the 2007-2008
season winners – Shifnal & Telford C (Division Three) RB, Telepost B
(Division Two) VC ; and Telepost A (Division One) KT. RT informed the meeting
that he would be resigning at the end of the forthcoming season. IW thanked
Richard for taking over the league.
c)
Treasurer. FT reported we had made a
small loss of £44.25. The league fees had gone down due to the loss of a team
whilst the game fee and MCCU fee had gone up. Whilst it may not be good for
Chess in general the lack of a Darwin Event had reduced expenditure by £25. An
increase in bank interest and an advertising fee for the website had also
masked the underlying problem. Engraving, travel and the Yearbook were
estimates. The accounts were accepted. Currently the league fees are £45 per
team, JC understood that Market Drayton were struggling to make a team and may
withdraw, GS reported that Church Stretton were likely to lose a team and
possibly the club might go if people willing to run the club weren’t found. In
light of this FB proposed an increase in league fees to £48 per team. JC made
an amended proposal of £50 which was carried 8 – 4. VC questioned if junior
teams should pay less. FB said that the game fee was a club charge and it was
up to the club to decide how they funded it.
d)
Auditor. Absent. He had signed the
accounts to confirm they had been audited.
e)
Grading officer NR reported that all results
have been sent off. Cox Trophy and Individual matches played up to the end of
May have been included. The grading list will be published at the end of July
with an amended list in August. Over the years grades have deflated this has
been exacerbated by the grading of junior events where few players have
accurate grades. As a result grades will be amended. This will have a major
impact with someone graded 100 now going up to as much as a 130. Top players in
the county are likely to go up by about 10 points. Next year there will be two
grades the official grade based on the current system and a preview of the new
grade only available on the ECF website which will form the basis of the
following season’s grade. JC commented that the grades used in rule 8 will need
reviewing.
f)
County individual. NR said that the deadline
for playing the games had been reached and with one game that affects the
winner outstanding Jamie Hopkins leads with 6/7, Nick is second with 5.5/7 but
Trevor Brotherton can tie with Jamie if he wins his outstanding game. With the
tiebreak also resulting in a tie the trophy may be shared as a playoff seems
unlikely. There had been 24 entries.
g)
Rapidplay. Vacant KG reported that no
one had come forward so unless another club wishes to take it over there will
be no more.
h)
Cox and Minor Trophies. Derrick was absent. IW reported
that the Cox final will be between Shifnal & Telford A and Telepost A on a
date to be agreed. The Minor knockout had reached the semi final stage.
i)
Publicity officer. TN reported that regular
items had been appearing in the Shropshire Star. Contributions were always
welcome as most of the information is picked up from the website. Any
interesting games forward them to Toby for publishing.
j)
Darwin event. Vacant. JC reported that
the Darwin centre was under new management and if someone did want to take over
they would effectively be starting from scratch as the contacts we had made
were no longer there.
k)
Website editor. KT thanked everyone for
their contribution. Some areas needed work (County & Junior in particular).
Our domain name (Shropshirechess.org) is currently hosted by netfirms for free
(the present cost is the fee for the domain name) but we have now reached our
capacity. If we want to develop the website we need to expand the available
space. There was a discussion about future plans for the website which were
being worked on by VC and the web designer who was responsible for the result
formfill we currently use. This may result in automatic input of results with
realtime league tables. KG advised caution especially as the people who would be
using the system were unlikely to be experienced in the software they were
using. Passwords / security also presented a problem. RT commented that he
would like to have control of the input as duplication of results and
formatting errors were commonplace with the current system. It was felt that
there were two issues What do we do with the extra space? More importantly that
extra capacity is needed. KT proposed that we move to a new host at a cost of
approximately £35 p.a. this was carried unanimously.
l)
Congress organiser. CR reported that we held a
congress which made a small profit full report available on the website. Next
years congress will as always be held the first weekend of January. GS and IW
after consulting their diaries confirmed this as 3-4 January. IW commented that
this was the earliest we had ever held it.
m)
County junior organiser. FB reported that this year
we entered a junior team in the county U100 section instead of entering the
normal EPSCA events. Although the team lost all of their games the top boards
showed that they can hold their own and that we just lack strength in depth. We
held a Chess Academy in the Autumn and will be repeating this. Several of the
juniors have qualified for the Gigafinal in the British Land Chess Challenge.
FB drew our attention to the renaissance academy, which is hoping to get local
chess associations involved in the coaching of juniors. The downside of the
initiative is the requirement for Public Liability Insurance, A formal Child
Protection Policy (something we should have already), CRB checks and
coordination of who is doing what. JC commented that he and John Liddell had
volunteered to go into Condover school but had received a lukewarm reaction
from the school. IW reported that he had a similar experience after being
involved in a minority sports day at Hadley Learning Community. FB felt that at
this stage we should monitor its progress but in the meantime volunteered to
draft a Child Protection Policy.
n)
County first team. WP reported that we lost
all the games in the season. We were however nominated for the ECF minor
counties where we had a bye in the quarter final stage and beat Cambridgeshire
on board count in the semis so without winning a game we have reached the ECF
minor counties final on the 6th July in Leicester. Best performance
was by NR with 4/4. WP asked for better support from the west of the county. He
confirmed his decision last year to step down as captain.
o)
County under 125 team. WP reported that we had
played three and lost three.
p)
Under 100 team. RB reported that five
teams entered 2 from Shropshire, 2 from Staffordshire and 1 from Warwickshire.
Shropshire won two and lost two although they were all close matches. RB said
he would not be running the team next season.
q)
MCCU delegate IW commented that he was
not an MCCU delegate. RT had nothing to report.
r) ECF delegate. NR reported that there had been a number of resignations at the ECF
most notably Martin Regan, who had hoped to shake up the Federation, had, after
18 months, resigned citing that reforms were proving difficult. The Federation
had therefore returned to the “old guard”. The ECF were looking to replace game
fees with membership but nothing had been resolved.
4)
Election
of officers. President, Iain Wilson; secretary, Colin Roberts; league
controller, Richard Thompson; treasurer, Francis Best; auditor, Glyn Pugh;
grading officer, Nick Rutter; county individual organiser, Nick Rutter;
Oswestry rapidplay, no nominations; Cox and minor knockout, Derrick Powell;
publicity officer, Toby Neal; Darwin festival, no nominations; website editor,
Keith Tabner; congress organiser, Colin Roberts; junior organisers, Steve
Rooney and Francis Best; county 1st team organiser, no nominations;
under 125 team organiser, no nominations; under 100 team, no nominations; MCCU
delegate, Richard Thompson; ECF delegate, Nick Rutter. RT then read the
following prepared proposal, which was a resurrection of a proposal he had
proposed a few years ago which although not introduced stimulated a number of
candidates to come forward. ‘It
is the responsibility of all member clubs to supply the Association with
personnel willing to act as officers necessary to enable it to provide the
services in clause 3 above. As there
is, at present (2008), a close correlation between the number of offices listed
at Appendix B (21) and the number of teams taking part in the League
Competition (22), each club will nominate one person to stand for office each
year for each team it intends to field during the following season. A new club will be excused one nominee
during each of its first five years’ membership of the Association, and
sympathetic consideration will be given to any club pleading genuine
difficulties in complying with this requirement.Failure to comply may result in
the obligation to pay an additional team fee in lieu of the officer’s
services.’ CR commented that the object of the association was to
promote chess and that this proposal was likely to result in clubs dropping out
of the league rather than paying the fee. KT commented that there was not
enough communication of the problem to the rest of the association beforehand.
The Website, Club noticeboards the Shropshire Star were all needed to be used
to convey the message. It was felt that a carrot rather than a stick should be
used and that giving a reduction in league fees to teams supplying officials
whilst achieving the same result (assuming an increase in league fees) appeared
to be a concession rather than a penalty. JC commented that three clubs were
not even represented at the meeting. IW commented that we could not carry on
with the same people holding posts. RT commented that if we didn’t fill the
county captain and league controller posts there would be no association.
Further debate ensued. RT requested an EGM before the council meeting to
discuss the proposal. An unconfirmed date was set of 3rd September
subject to availability of the Telepost venue.
5)
Proposed amendments to
league rules.
In view of the time it was decided to defer discussion on the proposed rule
change until the E.G.M. Despite this RT then explained the rule. KG asked to
comment but was told that we would not discuss it further. JC then responded to
RT that he did not intend to do anything wrong. Vinnie had deteriorated and
Nicks assessment of him confirmed this. Further debate was attempted but IW
called a halt and deferred it to the E.G.M.
6)
Proposed amendments to
constitution.
None.
7)
Any other business. JC In view of the
difficulty in getting required teams and increasing fuel costs would it be an
idea to reduce the number of players from 5 – 4 players? NR commented that it
might be useful in the third division. A proposal for consideration was
requested.
The
meeting finished at 10:40pm.